"> Public Doesn’t Distinguish Between Political, Charitable Fundraising – Ministry Watch

Type to search

Philanthropy Politics

Public Doesn’t Distinguish Between Political, Charitable Fundraising

The NonProfit Times

When Dr. Evil tells Austin Powers, “We’re not so different, you and I,” near the climax of the 1997 film, “Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery,” the global super villain could very well have been talking about the correlation between political giving and philanthropy.

The principles and dynamics involved in both nonprofit and political fundraising are similar, and so is donor intent, William H. Miller, CFRE, president and CEO of the Kean University Foundation in Union, N.J., wrote in a paper titled, “Prospect identification in an election year.”

Charitable donors want to see improved programs, literacy rates, health, housing, according to Miller. Political donors want to see inspiring leaders elected who will put new policies into place. However, the desire to make a difference — by creating a better society or a stronger community — is at the core of both political and philanthropic fundraising.

One of the most dramatic differences between the average nonprofit donor and the political donor is household income. People who give to presidential campaigns tend to have higher incomes (50 percent above $100,000), while those who give to nonprofits tend to have moderate to low incomes (50 percent between $25,000 and $75,000).

Miller noted several things that political and nonprofit fundraisers have in common:

  • Both are speaking to the same audience. Individuals who are civically engaged are also philanthropically inclined.
  • The public doesn’t distinguish between political and charitable fundraising.

Access to MinistryWatch content is free.  However, we hope you will support our work with your prayers and financial gifts.  To make a donation, click here.

Both have common challenges: The public’s views about fundraising are influenced by negative media coverage and scandals, as well as telemarketing.  Negative media coverage, however, tends to be limited to the organization or individual covered, so negative coverage of wrongdoing can help those organizations not involved in the wrongdoing.

Political fundraisers secure large amounts of money in short periods of time under stringent constraints, with fewer tools and techniques, and under tremendous public scrutiny. Nonprofit fundraisers should examine how they meet these challenges.

Organizations that examine political giving as they conduct prospect research, according to Miller, are better able to identify new prospects, build positive relationships with potential donors, and, to a large extent, upgrade financial prospects.

In a presidential election year, competition for the charitable dollar will certainly increase and become even fiercer than it already is, Miller said. In addition to the hundreds of billions of dollars that are given to worthy nonprofits this year, presidential candidates are also actively fundraising.

“While some in the nonprofit sector might find this extra competition to be discouraging, it is actually a great year for prospect research and qualification,” Miller said.

This article originally appeared in The Non-Profit Times.  You can read more here.  To subscribe to the free newsletter of The Non-Profit Times, click here.

Tags:
The NonProfit Times
The NonProfit Times

Our flagship publication, celebrating 31 years, reaches more than 36,000 executives of the nonprofit community in print and digital format, ranging from C-Suite executives to directors of fundraising, marketing, social media, and human resources departments to accounting and other financial management decision-makers. Nonprofit sector influencers on all levels turn to The NPT for news, information, and insight that consistently helps them achieve their professional goals.

    1

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *